The Expansion of Innovative Voter Registration Methods, 2000–2024
Research by April Tan and Kyle Yoder,
with assistance from Research Interns Jordan Phan, Carly Pyles, and Jane Wright
Overview
Over the last two decades, states have implemented several innovative policies that streamline the process of voter registration, promote voter list accuracy, and create more options for eligible citizens to register or update their voter registration. Such policy innovations include online voter registration (OVR), same-day voter registration (SDR), and automatic voter registration (AVR). The number of states that have implemented at least one of these three voter registration methods increased from seven states in 2000 to 46 states in 2024. To underscore this point: during the 2000 general election, less than 6% of voting-age citizens lived in states that had implemented one of these registration methods. As of this writing, nearly 90% of voting-age citizens live in states that will have at least one innovative registration method in place for the 2024 general election, and roughly one-third of voting-age citizens now live in states that have implemented all three methods.
The map below shows the innovative registration methods in each state and Washington, D.C., in each presidential election since 2000.
Availability of Innovative Voter Registration Methods, 2000-2024
Election officials in every state are required to verify each prospective voter’s identity and eligibility. The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) created minimum requirements for establishing and verifying voter identity and eligibility through the voter registration process, including requiring applicants to provide their driver’s license number or the last four digits of their social security number.[1] Historically, the basic voter registration method in the United States has required voters to submit a paper form to a local election office by some deadline before an election. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) created additional methods for voter registration in federal elections that apply to 44 states and Washington, D.C.[2] The NVRA requires these states to offer voter registration opportunities at motor vehicle agencies, by mail-in application, and at certain state agency and military recruiting offices.[3]
Defining Innovative Voter Registration Methods:
Online Voter Registration (OVR): A process by which eligible citizens may submit a new or updated voter registration application electronically via a state government website or app.
Same-Day Voter Registration (SDR): A process by which eligible citizens may register to vote or update their existing registration and cast a vote on the same day, either on Election Day or during the early in-person voting period.
Automatic Voter Registration (AVR): A system that registers eligible citizens to vote or updates their existing registrations during an interaction with a designated government agency (e.g., the DMV) by automatically and electronically transferring relevant information from designated government agencies to election officials, unless a citizen withholds permission for the agency to do so.
For the upcoming 2024 general election, 46 states and Washington, D.C., will have at least one innovative voter registration method in place beyond these basic methods. Of these, 43 will have OVR, 25 will have SDR, and 24 will have AVR, with 29 states and Washington, D.C., administering two or all three of these registration methods.
Benefits of Innovative Voter Registration Methods
Innovative voter registration methods promote administrative efficiency, enhance election security, and promote voter access. Online voter registration (OVR), same-day voter registration (SDR), and automatic voter registration (AVR) have been embraced in states across the U.S. over the last two decades, with implementation efforts led by state legislatures and governors from both major parties.
OVR, SDR, and AVR improve administrative efficiency and voter list accuracy, which enhances election security. When registration is done automatically or online, officials save on the time and resources associated with manual data entry, voter list updates, and error correction related to handwritten forms.[4] OVR and AVR systems can also efficiently verify prospective voters’ information against existing records in other state databases and electronically transfer relevant information to election officials, further reducing the potential for administrative errors and delays as well as offering additional verification of identity.[5] Since registration through an AVR system is tied to life events that might bring one to a government office like a motor vehicles agency—such as moving residences or coming of age—voters’ information is updated in a timely manner. As an extra safety net, SDR gives prospective voters the opportunity to update their registration before they vote, which creates the most up-to-date record possible. The greater amount of verified, up-to-date voter information granted by these registration methods helps election administrators as they work to prevent, detect, and mitigate any potential issues that may arise before, during, or after the election.[6]
Innovative voter registration methods also promote access to the democratic process by allowing citizens to more easily register or update their registration. Eligible citizens in states with OVR, AVR, and SDR can choose to register online, automatically while applying for a driver’s license, or at the time of casting a ballot. Because these registration methods enhance voter list accuracy, the likelihood increases that important election mail will be successfully delivered, precincts will be assigned correctly, and voter transactions will be processed in a timely manner.[7] AVR also reduces the number of inactive records on voter lists by keeping registration records up to date, while SDR ensures that any voters who did not register to vote in time, were mistakenly removed from the voter list, or had errors in their registration record are still able to vote during an election.[8]
How CEIR Measured the Expansion of Innovative Voter Registration Methods
To trace the expansion of innovative voter registration methods nationwide since the 2000 general election, the CEIR research team reviewed administrative agreements, ballot measures, and enacting or extant legislation for relevant voter registration methods in each state. This data was then cross-referenced with state government sources, news articles, and survey responses from Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS) reports published by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Where the categorization or implementation year of a given voter registration method was unclear, the research team deferred to the definitions and interpretations of the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).
Variation in policies and processes has spurred an ongoing debate in the election administration field about what is categorized as automatic voter registration (AVR).[9] For the purposes of this report, CEIR relied on the National Conference of State Legislature’s (NCSL) categorization of AVR.
All information in this report regarding the 2024 general election is current as of August 12, 2024, and may be subject to change due to legislation, litigation, or other developments as the election approaches. For more information on voter registration deadlines for in-person, online, and mail-in registration, keep an eye out for CEIR’s upcoming companion data dive. Voters should visit vote.gov or ask their local election officials to confirm deadlines and procedures for the voter registration methods available in their state.
Additional Resources
Additional information and perspectives on this topic are available at the following resources:
- National Conference of State Legislatures, “Online Voter Registration,”
https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/online-voter-registration. - National Conference of State Legislatures, “Same-Day Voter Registration,”
https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/same-day-voter-registration. - National Conference of State Legislatures, “Automatic Voter Registration,”
https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/automatic-voter-registration.
Citations
Citations | |
---|---|
Alabama | OVR: Office of the Alabama Secretary of State, “Secretary Merrill Unveils Electronic Voter Registration,” February 2, 2016
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Alaska | OVR: Alaska Division of Elections, “Program and Budget Narrative 2018 -2023 HAVA Elections Security Grants Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 Narrative,” February 14, 2023
SDR: N/A AVR:Ballot Measure: No. 1 – 15PFVR |
Arizona | OVR: Office of the Arizona Secretary of State, “Arizonans Register to Vote Online! Secretary of State Betsey Bayless and MVD Announce EZ Voter Registration,” August 6, 2022 SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Arkansas | OVR: N/A
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
California | OVR: 2011 Cal SB 397
SDR: 2012 Cal AB 1436 AVR: 2015 Cal AB 1461 |
Colorado | OVR: 2009 Colo. HB. 1160
SDR: 2013 Colo. HB. 1303 AVR: Justin Grimmer and Jonathan Rodden, “Changing the Default: The Impact of Motor-Voter Reform in Colorado,” January 2022 |
Connecticut | OVR: 2012 Ct. HB 5024
SDR: 2012 Ct. HB 5024; 2023 Ct. HB 5004 AVR: Secretary of the State of Connecticut and the Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles, “Connecticut Secretary of the State and the Department of Motor Vehicles Sign First-of-its-Kind Automatic Voter Registration Pact,” May 17, 2016 |
Delaware | OVR: State of Delaware, “The Department of Elections for New Castle County issues an assessment of Delaware’s Election System in relation to the key recommendations of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration,” February 11, 2014
SDR: N/A AVR: 2021 Del. SB 5 |
District of Columbia | OVR: D.C. Board of Elections, “Regular Board Meeting – 03-05-2014,” March 5, 2014
SDR: D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, “Fact Sheet on New Voting Procedures: Voting Early, by Mail, or at the Polls on Election Day,” accessed July 15, 2024 AVR: 2015 D.C. B 194 |
Florida | OVR: 2015 Fla. SB 228
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Georgia | OVR: 2011 Ga. SB 92
SDR: N/A AVR: Mary Plummer, “Reducing Voters’ Paperwork Might Expand The Voter Rolls,” April 19, 2018 |
Hawaii | OVR: 2011 Hi. HB 1755
SDR: 2013 Hi. HB 2590 AVR: 2021 Hi. SB 159 |
Idaho | OVR: 2016 Ida. SB 1297
SDR: 1994 Ida. HB 603 AVR: N/A |
Illinois | OVR: 2013 ILL. HB 2418
SDR: 2003 ILL. SB 2133 AVR: 2013 ILL. SB 172 |
Indiana | OVR: 2009 Ind. HEA 1346
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Iowa | OVR: Office of the Iowa Secretary of State, “Electronic Voter Registration System Makes Iowa National Leader in Accessibility,” January 4, 2016
SDR: 2007 Ia. HF 653 AVR: N/A |
Kansas | OVR: Office of the Kansas Secretary of State, “Thornburgh, Wagnon Launch Online Voter Registration Application,” July 28, 2009
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Kentucky | OVR: Commonwealth of Kentucky, “Grimes Announces GoVoteKY.com Hits 1 Million Visitors,” April 17, 2019
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Louisiana | OVR: 2009 La. HB 520
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Maine | OVR: 2021 Me. HP 804
SDR: 1985 Me. LD 1595; 2001 Me. HP 798; Ballot Measure: 2011 Question 1; 2011 Me. SP 563 AVR: 2019 Me. HP 1070 |
Maryland | OVR: 2011 Md. HB 740
SDR: 2013 Md. HB 224; 2019 Md. HB 286 AVR: 2018 Md. SB 1048 |
Massachusetts | OVR: 2013 Mass. H.B. 3788
SDR: N/A AVR: 2017 Mass. HB 4834 |
Michigan | OVR: 2017 Mi. S.B. 425
SDR: Amendment: 2018 Initiative Petition 3; 2017 Mi. SB 1238 AVR: Amendment: 2018 Initiative Petition 3; 2017 Mi. SB 1238 |
Minnesota | OVR: Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State, “Online Voter Registration Now Available for All Minnesota Military, Overseas and Domestic Voters; Active Duty Military and Overseas Voter Can Apply Online for Absentee Ballots,” September 26, 2013
SDR: 1973 Minn. S.F. No.1246; 1990 Minn. S.F. No. 2229 AVR: 2023 Minn. H.F. No. 3 |
Mississippi | OVR: N/A
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Missouri | OVR: Office of the Missouri Secretary of State, “Kander Recognizes September 23 as National Voter Registration Day,” September 23, 2014
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Montana | OVR: N/A
SDR: 2005 Mt. SB 302 AVR: N/A |
Nebraska | OVR: 2013 Neb. LB 661
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Nevada | OVR: 2011 Nev. AB 82
SDR: 2019 Nev. AB 345 AVR: Ballot Measure: State Question No. 5 (2018); 2019 Nev. AB 345 |
New Hampshire | OVR: N/A
SDR: 1994 NH HB 1506 AVR: N/A |
New Jersey | OVR: 2018 N.J. S.N. 589
SDR: N/A AVR: 2018 N.J. A.N. 2014 |
New Mexico | OVR: 2013 N.M. HB 497
SDR: 2019 N.M. SB 672 AVR: 2019 N.M. SB 672 |
New York | OVR: 2019 N.Y. SB 1505
SDR: 2023 N.Y. SB 5984 AVR: 2020 N.Y. SB 8806; AVR will not be implemented before the 2024 election (conversation with the New York State Board of Elections on July 10, 2024) |
North Carolina | OVR: North Carolina State Board of Elections, “State Board, DMV Partner to Expand Online Voter Registration Service,” March 30, 2020
SDR: 2007 N.C. HB 91 AVR: N/A |
North Dakota | North Dakota does not require formal voter registration, but eligible citizens must present a valid form of identification that includes their name, current residential address, and date of birth before casting a ballot on Election Day or during the early in-person voting period. This information must be verified by election officials in order for the ballot to be counted. N.D. Cent. Code, § 16.1-01-04.1 |
Ohio | OVR: 2015 Ohio SB 63
SDR: 2005 Ohio HB 3; 2013 Ohio SB 238 AVR: N/A |
Oklahoma | OVR: 2015 OK. SB 313
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Oregon | OVR: 2009 Ore. HB 2386
SDR: N/A AVR: 2015 Ore. HB 2177 |
Pennsylvania | OVR: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, “Pennsylvania launches online voter registration to increase efficiency and offer convenience,” August 27, 2015
SDR: N/A AVR: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, “Governor Shapiro Implements Automatic Voter Registration in Pennsylvania, Joining Bipartisan Group of States That Have Taken Commonsense Step to Make Voter Registration More Streamlined and Secure,” September 19, 2023 |
Rhode Island | OVR: 2015 R.I. SB 2513
SDR: N/A AVR: 2017 R.I. HB 5702 |
South Carolina | OVR: 2011 S.C. H.B. 4945
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
South Dakota | OVR: N/A
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Tennessee | OVR: 2015 Tenn. SB 1626
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Texas | OVR: N/A
SDR: N/A AVR: N/A |
Utah | OVR: 2009 Ut. SB 25
SDR: 2018 Ut. HB 218 AVR: N/A |
Vermont | OVR: Office of the Vermont Secretary of State, “Sec’y of State Condos Announces Roll-Out of Online Voter Registration System,” October 22, 2015
SDR: 2015 Vt. S. 29 AVR: 2015 Vt. H. 458 |
Virginia | OVR: 2012 Va. HB 2341
SDR: 2020 Va. HB 201 AVR: 2020 Va. HB 235 |
Washington | OVR: 2007 Wa. HB 1528
SDR: 2017 Wa. SB 6021 AVR: 2017 Wa. HB 2595 |
West Virginia | OVR: 2013 W.V. SB 477
SDR: N/A AVR: 2016 W.V. HB 4013 |
Wisconsin | OVR: 2015 Wis. SB 295
SDR: 1975 Wis. SB 234; 1977 Wis. AB 885 AVR: N/A |
Wyoming | OVR: N/A
SDR: 1993 Wy. HB 312; 2009 Wy. SF 26 AVR: N/A |
[1] 52 USCS § 21083.
[2] 52 USCS § 20501 et seq.
[3] Among the six states currently exempt from NVRA compliance, only Minnesota offers voter registration at motor vehicle agencies, by mail-in application, and at certain state agency and military recruiting offices. Idaho, Wisconsin, and Wyoming only offer mail registration. New Hampshire only offers registration by mail to certain eligible citizens. North Dakota does not require formal voter registration, but eligible citizens must present a valid form of identification that includes their name, current residential address, and date of birth before casting a ballot in-person or by mail. These states were granted exemption from NVRA compliance because they either did not require voter registration or offered election-day voter registration before the designated August 1994 deadline and have kept these policies in place continuously since August 1994.
[4] United States Government Accountability Office, “Issues Related to Registering Voters and Administering Elections,” June 2016, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-16-630.pdf.
[5] Congressional Research Service, “Voter Registration: Recent Developments and Issues for Congress,” updated September 19, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46406; National Conference of State Legislatures, “Online Voter Registration,” updated July 11, 2024, https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/online-voter-registration.
[6] Congressional Research Service, “Voter Registration Records and List Maintenance for Federal Elections,” October 21, 2021, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R46943.pdf.
[7] Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, “The Importance of Accurate Voter Data When Expanding Absentee or Mail Ballot Voting,” accessed July 22, 2024, https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/importance_of_accurate_voter_data_508.pdf; U.S. Election Assistance Commission, “Helping America Vote: Voter List Maintenance,” accessed July 22, 2024, https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/electionofficials/VoterList/Voter_List_Maintenance_Overview_V2_508.pdf.
[8] U.S. Election Assistance Commission, “Best Practices: Voter List Maintenance,” March 2023, https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/electionofficials/VoterList/Best_Practices_Voter_List_Maintenance_V1_508.pdf; Congressional Research Service, “Voter Registration: Recent Developments and Issues for Congress.”
[9] Some experts only consider as having AVR states where eligible citizens are notified after their information is sent to the voter registration agency (i.e., back-end systems). Other experts include in their categorization of AVR states where eligible citizens are registered by default unless they decline (i.e., front-end default systems) or are required to answer yes/no (i.e., front-end forced choice systems such as Utah and South Dakota).